<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1K Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hdguru.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-gh1k-review/1347/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hdguru.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-gh1k-review/1347/</link>
	<description>HD Guru for the latest news, reviews, archives and consumer information about High Definition Television</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 21:53:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick K. Callaway</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-gh1k-review/1347/comment-page-1/#comment-67210</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick K. Callaway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=1347#comment-67210</guid>
		<description>I held off buying a DSLR for years due to the size, cost, and complications. My past experience was with film SLR&#039;s in the 70&#039;s and 80&#039;s. The DSLR&#039;s just seemed like big slugs with too many buttons. MY point and shoot digital canon was just fine, thank you.

I bought this unit because of its size and customer reviews. I am extremely happy with it. Compact enough, suitably automatic when needed, suitably manual when needed, extremely long battery life, reasonably easy controls, great picture quality. I bought two lenses (wide to slight tele and long telephoto zoom) and both are fine and I got an adapter for my old pentax film lens set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I held off buying a DSLR for years due to the size, cost, and complications. My past experience was with film SLR&#8217;s in the 70&#8242;s and 80&#8242;s. The DSLR&#8217;s just seemed like big slugs with too many buttons. MY point and shoot digital canon was just fine, thank you.</p>
<p>I bought this unit because of its size and customer reviews. I am extremely happy with it. Compact enough, suitably automatic when needed, suitably manual when needed, extremely long battery life, reasonably easy controls, great picture quality. I bought two lenses (wide to slight tele and long telephoto zoom) and both are fine and I got an adapter for my old pentax film lens set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/panasonic-lumix-dmc-gh1k-review/1347/comment-page-1/#comment-65374</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=1347#comment-65374</guid>
		<description>I have a Canon Digital Camera.  I LOVE taking photos.  I travel often, and I enjoy taking pictures of architecture, landscape, etc.  I am by no means an expert, however, and wonder, with the recent influx of &quot;Phone Camera&#039;s&quot;being used, whether there is any point in pursuing photography with an actual camera.  I would very much like to learn the minutiae of photography, but if everyone is merely content to snap pics with their phone, is it a dying art?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Canon Digital Camera.  I LOVE taking photos.  I travel often, and I enjoy taking pictures of architecture, landscape, etc.  I am by no means an expert, however, and wonder, with the recent influx of &#8220;Phone Camera&#8217;s&#8221;being used, whether there is any point in pursuing photography with an actual camera.  I would very much like to learn the minutiae of photography, but if everyone is merely content to snap pics with their phone, is it a dying art?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

