The problems with 3D – We in the United Kingdom haven’t got broadcasting in 1920 x 1080p yet and 3D requires twice as much space?

Apart for; cartoons or CGI (computerised cartoons) I probably haven’t seen any 3D’s film.

1: I have seen Avatar, which apart for some few snow flakes which appears to land between the screen & the viewer it is maybe at least 99% 2D.

2: I have seen excellent video clips at Imax’s cinemas – took part in simulators – I have been seen 4D (superior than 3D) at the London Eye, which are excellent.

3: Too many Directors claim that they don’t want to make proper 3D’s films, because people will get headaches – Reminds me of the story about the king wearing the invisble suit – he was naked – boy who wasn’t told shouted that the king was naked.

The next problem even if it was possible to obtain excellent 3D:

1: The 3D costs; 3D TV, 3D AV Receiver, HDMI’s 1.4 (properly shielded) cables, 3D’s glasses (will require a pair for each person who wants to watch a 3D TV and probably one for each different type of TV) proper 3D material with uncompressed signal, 3D film discs (Not all Blu-ray discs have 1080p and HD sound) and also when do you think there will be 3D’s broadcasts channels – When the establishment are principally concerned with maximizing their profits. –

Probably, the principal reasons why we have; BD live (internet features on discs, 1080p resolution, HD sound on some discs is because of HD DVD who lost the HD DVD versus Blu-ray war.

2: What does the establishment expect us to do with our new exising HD’s systems throw them into the bin to make them rich?

The best advice is like computers wait for 2 to 3 years before wasting your money.

HDMI 1.4 probably could have been inserted into HDMI 1.1c instead of ripping consumers off –

Perhaps, ripping us off is an exaggeration –

Originally, faulty HDMI’s connection which didn’t work – Manufacturers didn’t carry out proper checks – Manufacturers can legally claim that products meet HDMI 1.4 standard even though probably not a single feature is between HDMI 1.3 and HDMI 1.4 standard.

Panasonic should explain how they can call a TX-P42S10 (UK model – http://www.Panasonic.co.uk) a Full HD plasma TV when only 900P lines are for moving resolution and the other 180 lines are apparently not moving.

I thought that Full HD meant 1,920 x 1080P = 2,073,600 greater than 2 million but 1,920 x 900 = 1,728,000 is less than 2 million

Plasma’s manufacturers should place large warnings on TVs, which state that TVs should be run-in for 200 hours with; contrast and brightness reduced to 50% or half (1/2) way – They should also state what their definition (what they mean) when they say that burn-in can occur if the TV is left on for a long period (picture not moving), because for example a channel’s logos could be on for hours if watching the same channel and the consumer would be blaimed. – If Panasonic and other plasma manufacturers have so much faith in their products than burn-in should be included within their manufacturers’s guarantee.

Especially, when they claim that it is virtually impossible for those defects to occur.

Does the plasma 3D’s TVs have a similar display defect problem to the plasma 2D’s TVs? – Panasonic should also place large warnings about not only their blackness control problems but who actually independently and objectively checks the life in hours of TVs and what settings were used

I am also not impress when it is implied that there are less than 24 hours in a day, to make the life of TVs look impressive by manufacturers?

Before I forget, I think the CNET’s article actually states that in the United Kingdom that Samsung may give away a free pair of glasses to consumers who buy both a 3D’s TV and a 3D’s Blu-ray player.

The next con (buy a new 3D TV after you have already purchased a 3D TV) is probably; not telling people that they will also require a computer (for example a Sony KDL-40W5810 Freesat TV and Sony BDP-S363 Blu ray player UK – connect using; an ethernet link – burn a disc), sooner or later it will be better to have a combined high speed HDMI and Ethernet connection/cable, A 3D’s TV with an internal web’s browser.

If Wii and telephone consumers can download free web’s browser to serve the internet then upgradable TVs should be able to download a free upgrade.

Some consumers are in for a real shock; buying a 3D TV, 3D Blu-ray player and 3D glasses is the least of their problems – Calibration in 3D should be interesting.

Since, the CES (Consumer Electronic Show) in Las vegas have the manufacturers decided on the standards, for glasses, should be or are they still trying to resolve the problem?

When did they managed to stream line 1920x1080p for home users, because I thought that the resolution streaming (wirelessly) were; 720p/1080i?

Will Direct TV’s 3D channel be available in the United Kingdom, especially on Virgin Media?

HD Guru’s article: ‘…First full HD 3D TVs to arrive this month-online retailers are taking orders…’

It says that Samsung’s 3D TVs can convert 2D into 3D, but if it can then;
1: Why is , ‘…special 3D content video material required…’ – to obtain 3D and
2: What is the 3D quality like?

br Jens

Once the page fully loads, move the cursor over the “here” link and wait a second or two and a pull down menu will appear. Hit the pre-order button for more info.

HD Guru