<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EXCLUSIVE: First Review of the Samsung BD-P1200</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hdguru.com/exclusive-first-review-of-the-samsung-bd-p1200/77/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hdguru.com/exclusive-first-review-of-the-samsung-bd-p1200/77/</link>
	<description>HD Guru for the latest news, reviews, archives and consumer information about High Definition Television</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:45:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Westcott</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/exclusive-first-review-of-the-samsung-bd-p1200/77/comment-page-1/#comment-13989</link>
		<dc:creator>Westcott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=77#comment-13989</guid>
		<description>Kevin,

The Samsung 1400 does not have the SO Reon processor so it is a step backwards in video quality, especially for SD DVDs. I purchased a slightly used BD-1200 on eBay for $256. New and refurbished units are still available on eBay.

I also bought the HD-XA2 for its equally stunning video processing capabilities for SD DVDs and HD DVDs. It does support HD DTS and Dolby HD but unfortunately, my Denon 3805 does not.

Does anyone have any information on the BD-P2400? Specifically the video processor used?

Happy Holidays to everyone!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>The Samsung 1400 does not have the SO Reon processor so it is a step backwards in video quality, especially for SD DVDs. I purchased a slightly used BD-1200 on eBay for $256. New and refurbished units are still available on eBay.</p>
<p>I also bought the HD-XA2 for its equally stunning video processing capabilities for SD DVDs and HD DVDs. It does support HD DTS and Dolby HD but unfortunately, my Denon 3805 does not.</p>
<p>Does anyone have any information on the BD-P2400? Specifically the video processor used?</p>
<p>Happy Holidays to everyone!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/exclusive-first-review-of-the-samsung-bd-p1200/77/comment-page-1/#comment-12336</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 06:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=77#comment-12336</guid>
		<description>How does the Samsung 1400 compare and does it use the Silicon Optix chipset?  I cant find any information on the 1400 and the 1200 doesnt seem to be on the shelves anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does the Samsung 1400 compare and does it use the Silicon Optix chipset?  I cant find any information on the 1400 and the 1200 doesnt seem to be on the shelves anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MACK</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/exclusive-first-review-of-the-samsung-bd-p1200/77/comment-page-1/#comment-10179</link>
		<dc:creator>MACK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 08:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=77#comment-10179</guid>
		<description>ANYONE HAVE YHR URC CODE FOR THIS PRODUCT? I DON&#039;T WANT IT IF IT WONT WORK WITH MY UNIVERSAL/DRT/SAT REMOTE CONTROLLER.  THE URC IS LOCATED ON THE BACK OF THE REMOTE CONTROL, HAS 3-5 DIGITS AND BEGINS WITH&quot;URC&quot; THANKS - MACK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ANYONE HAVE YHR URC CODE FOR THIS PRODUCT? I DON&#8217;T WANT IT IF IT WONT WORK WITH MY UNIVERSAL/DRT/SAT REMOTE CONTROLLER.  THE URC IS LOCATED ON THE BACK OF THE REMOTE CONTROL, HAS 3-5 DIGITS AND BEGINS WITH&#8221;URC&#8221; THANKS &#8211; MACK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Ling</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/exclusive-first-review-of-the-samsung-bd-p1200/77/comment-page-1/#comment-8807</link>
		<dc:creator>James Ling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=77#comment-8807</guid>
		<description>The point is that the video quality will improve because you are doubling your bandwidth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is that the video quality will improve because you are doubling your bandwidth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GARoss</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/exclusive-first-review-of-the-samsung-bd-p1200/77/comment-page-1/#comment-5717</link>
		<dc:creator>GARoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 12:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=77#comment-5717</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the point of having HDMI 1.3a if it &quot;...supports Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus and DTS but does not support DTS-HD or Dolby TrueHD.&quot; ?
I thought having HDMI 1.3a would mean that it would pass both DTS-HD and Dolby TrueHD codec on to a receiver that would decode it.

&lt;strong&gt;No argument from me. Just because a device is 1.3 does not mean it contains the entire feature set of audio and video 1.3 functions.Ã‚Â  yuio need to do your homework and check a units functionality list before purchasing. I plan to cover this in a HDMI Demystified article soon.
&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;The HD GuruÃ‚Â &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the point of having HDMI 1.3a if it &#8220;&#8230;supports Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus and DTS but does not support DTS-HD or Dolby TrueHD.&#8221; ?<br />
I thought having HDMI 1.3a would mean that it would pass both DTS-HD and Dolby TrueHD codec on to a receiver that would decode it.</p>
<p><strong>No argument from me. Just because a device is 1.3 does not mean it contains the entire feature set of audio and video 1.3 functions.Ã‚Â  yuio need to do your homework and check a units functionality list before purchasing. I plan to cover this in a HDMI Demystified article soon.<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>The HD GuruÃ‚Â </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac McCall</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/exclusive-first-review-of-the-samsung-bd-p1200/77/comment-page-1/#comment-5607</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac McCall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=77#comment-5607</guid>
		<description>I just bought the latest model Samsung 40&quot; HDTV @ 1080P.
I connected with Directv. I have the HD Recorder and it is connected to my TV with a HDMI cable. It will not work with the HDMI cable. It will only work with the component cables. I called tec. service and was told that Samsung and Magnavox will not work with HDMI. They said it was a software problem and they were working on this problem.  Could this be possible?

&lt;strong&gt;When it comes to HDMI anything is possible. May I suggest you contact Samsung customer service to verify.&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;The HD GuruÃ‚Â Ã‚Â Ã‚Â &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought the latest model Samsung 40&#8243; HDTV @ 1080P.<br />
I connected with Directv. I have the HD Recorder and it is connected to my TV with a HDMI cable. It will not work with the HDMI cable. It will only work with the component cables. I called tec. service and was told that Samsung and Magnavox will not work with HDMI. They said it was a software problem and they were working on this problem.  Could this be possible?</p>
<p><strong>When it comes to HDMI anything is possible. May I suggest you contact Samsung customer service to verify.</strong></p>
<p><strong>The HD GuruÃ‚Â Ã‚Â Ã‚Â </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/exclusive-first-review-of-the-samsung-bd-p1200/77/comment-page-1/#comment-5028</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 01:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=77#comment-5028</guid>
		<description>I just purchased a Samsung HD-870C DVD player.  It&#039;s not a true HD DVD player (it upconverts standard DVDs up to 1080i) but Samsung includes a HDMI cable with it.  I don&#039;t see how it is possible for Samsung to include the cable in a $70 DVD player and leave it out the $799 BD-P1200!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just purchased a Samsung HD-870C DVD player.  It&#8217;s not a true HD DVD player (it upconverts standard DVDs up to 1080i) but Samsung includes a HDMI cable with it.  I don&#8217;t see how it is possible for Samsung to include the cable in a $70 DVD player and leave it out the $799 BD-P1200!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etype2</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/exclusive-first-review-of-the-samsung-bd-p1200/77/comment-page-1/#comment-3294</link>
		<dc:creator>etype2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=77#comment-3294</guid>
		<description>Very good review and insight. I&#039;m waiting to see how Sony&#039;s upcomming 2nd generation player will do. $500.00,likely discounted to $400.00.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good review and insight. I&#8217;m waiting to see how Sony&#8217;s upcomming 2nd generation player will do. $500.00,likely discounted to $400.00.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petri Teittinen</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/exclusive-first-review-of-the-samsung-bd-p1200/77/comment-page-1/#comment-3290</link>
		<dc:creator>Petri Teittinen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=77#comment-3290</guid>
		<description>Heh, actually, yeah. The number of pixels does indeed drop by half, so 50% is correct. The drop would be a lot bigger if the player outputs 960x540.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, actually, yeah. The number of pixels does indeed drop by half, so 50% is correct. The drop would be a lot bigger if the player outputs 960&#215;540.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petri Teittinen</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/exclusive-first-review-of-the-samsung-bd-p1200/77/comment-page-1/#comment-3289</link>
		<dc:creator>Petri Teittinen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=77#comment-3289</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sony player drops 1080i to 540p using its 1080p output mode. This means 50% of the resolution within the disc is lost.&quot;

Surely not? I was under the impression the output drops to 1920x540 which is only a 25% drop in resolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sony player drops 1080i to 540p using its 1080p output mode. This means 50% of the resolution within the disc is lost.&#8221;</p>
<p>Surely not? I was under the impression the output drops to 1920&#215;540 which is only a 25% drop in resolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

