<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CES Part 2 Samsung Plasma, DLP and LCD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hdguru.com/ces-part-2-samsung-plasma-dlp-and-lcd/39/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hdguru.com/ces-part-2-samsung-plasma-dlp-and-lcd/39/</link>
	<description>HD Guru for the latest news, reviews, archives and consumer information about High Definition Television</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:48:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TV Wall Mounting</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/ces-part-2-samsung-plasma-dlp-and-lcd/39/comment-page-1/#comment-39007</link>
		<dc:creator>TV Wall Mounting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=39#comment-39007</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mickey parr</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/ces-part-2-samsung-plasma-dlp-and-lcd/39/comment-page-1/#comment-1132</link>
		<dc:creator>mickey parr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=39#comment-1132</guid>
		<description>Do you have any thoughts on Samsung LN-S4096D VS Sony KDL40V2500? Which one would you choose? Or neither?

&lt;strong&gt;Both companies use Samsung panels. I prefer the greater feature set on the Samsung, though I recommend the superior image quality of the top plasma panels (as seen in my archive)&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;The HD GuruÃ‚Â &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have any thoughts on Samsung LN-S4096D VS Sony KDL40V2500? Which one would you choose? Or neither?</p>
<p><strong>Both companies use Samsung panels. I prefer the greater feature set on the Samsung, though I recommend the superior image quality of the top plasma panels (as seen in my archive)</strong></p>
<p><strong>The HD GuruÃ‚Â </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeRoy</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/ces-part-2-samsung-plasma-dlp-and-lcd/39/comment-page-1/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>LeRoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=39#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>If a tv has an HD tuner can it receive hd cable signal without the cable box from the tv station?

I&lt;strong&gt;f the HD tuner within the HDTV also includes QAM tuning (many do) you will be able to view the HD broadcasts signals you cable provider sends (they are unencrypted) however, you will have to scan and note the channel numbers because they usually don&#039;t match the listings (i.e. Channel 4 HD may appear as 89.1).&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;To see all HD Cable channels with proper channel mapping you will need a &quot;digital cable ready&quot; (DCR) HDTV with a cablecard slot and of course obtain a cablecard from your cable provider.&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;The HD GuruÃ‚Â &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a tv has an HD tuner can it receive hd cable signal without the cable box from the tv station?</p>
<p>I<strong>f the HD tuner within the HDTV also includes QAM tuning (many do) you will be able to view the HD broadcasts signals you cable provider sends (they are unencrypted) however, you will have to scan and note the channel numbers because they usually don&#8217;t match the listings (i.e. Channel 4 HD may appear as 89.1).</strong></p>
<p><strong>To see all HD Cable channels with proper channel mapping you will need a &#8220;digital cable ready&#8221; (DCR) HDTV with a cablecard slot and of course obtain a cablecard from your cable provider.</strong></p>
<p><strong>The HD GuruÃ‚Â </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/ces-part-2-samsung-plasma-dlp-and-lcd/39/comment-page-1/#comment-1093</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=39#comment-1093</guid>
		<description>Er, sorry. CC price on the HL-S5687W is $1.99K, not $19.9. That&#039;d be an expensive set, for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, sorry. CC price on the HL-S5687W is $1.99K, not $19.9. That&#8217;d be an expensive set, for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/ces-part-2-samsung-plasma-dlp-and-lcd/39/comment-page-1/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=39#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>@born in the 40&#039;s:

I think that may not be the case so much, anymore...at least not with DLPs. I don&#039;t know from LCDs, since that&#039;s not where I&#039;ve been looking. :) 

The Samsung HL-S5679W was originally listed last year at something over $4K, which would be too much. But a quick search today shows it between $2.3 and $2.4K. The HL-S5687W, which I believe is the similar non-LED model, is running $19.9K at Circuit City as of this morning. That&#039;s not too shabby a gap, really.

The only other LED RPTV maker I&#039;m aware of (though this may represent a serious gap in my research) is NuVision. Their stuff IS overpriced, IMO.

Pricing speculation I&#039;ve seen on the newest LED sets from Samsung suggests they&#039;re going to run in the same range as the currently-available unit. I&#039;m thinking that&#039;s not too bad for 1080p and 50-60 inches. Though I could be wrong. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@born in the 40&#8242;s:</p>
<p>I think that may not be the case so much, anymore&#8230;at least not with DLPs. I don&#8217;t know from LCDs, since that&#8217;s not where I&#8217;ve been looking. :) </p>
<p>The Samsung HL-S5679W was originally listed last year at something over $4K, which would be too much. But a quick search today shows it between $2.3 and $2.4K. The HL-S5687W, which I believe is the similar non-LED model, is running $19.9K at Circuit City as of this morning. That&#8217;s not too shabby a gap, really.</p>
<p>The only other LED RPTV maker I&#8217;m aware of (though this may represent a serious gap in my research) is NuVision. Their stuff IS overpriced, IMO.</p>
<p>Pricing speculation I&#8217;ve seen on the newest LED sets from Samsung suggests they&#8217;re going to run in the same range as the currently-available unit. I&#8217;m thinking that&#8217;s not too bad for 1080p and 50-60 inches. Though I could be wrong. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: born in the 40's</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/ces-part-2-samsung-plasma-dlp-and-lcd/39/comment-page-1/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator>born in the 40's</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 08:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=39#comment-1070</guid>
		<description>Most LED TV are selling for a much higher price than other comparable quality TV of the same size. That alone took away the benefits of long life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most LED TV are selling for a much higher price than other comparable quality TV of the same size. That alone took away the benefits of long life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/ces-part-2-samsung-plasma-dlp-and-lcd/39/comment-page-1/#comment-1038</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 03:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=39#comment-1038</guid>
		<description>Any word on street dates for the Phlatlight models?

&lt;strong&gt;Not yet, but I expect Samsung&#039;s new models to appear around the 2nd qtr 2007. I&#039;ll post specifics when they become available.&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;The HD GURUÃ‚Â &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any word on street dates for the Phlatlight models?</p>
<p><strong>Not yet, but I expect Samsung&#8217;s new models to appear around the 2nd qtr 2007. I&#8217;ll post specifics when they become available.</strong></p>
<p><strong>The HD GURUÃ‚Â </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Taylor</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/ces-part-2-samsung-plasma-dlp-and-lcd/39/comment-page-1/#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 02:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=39#comment-981</guid>
		<description>Any info regarding Panasonic 2007 plasmas?

&lt;strong&gt;Its just been posted&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;The HD GuruÃ‚Â &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any info regarding Panasonic 2007 plasmas?</p>
<p><strong>Its just been posted</strong></p>
<p><strong>The HD GuruÃ‚Â </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/ces-part-2-samsung-plasma-dlp-and-lcd/39/comment-page-1/#comment-976</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=39#comment-976</guid>
		<description>Thank you for responding promptly. I was asking cause Vizio has a 60&quot; plasma for $2,999 which seems pretty cheap to me. I havent heard any negativity about Vizio so i was wondering if they maybe cutting corners somewhere.
Mack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for responding promptly. I was asking cause Vizio has a 60&#8243; plasma for $2,999 which seems pretty cheap to me. I havent heard any negativity about Vizio so i was wondering if they maybe cutting corners somewhere.<br />
Mack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack</title>
		<link>http://hdguru.com/ces-part-2-samsung-plasma-dlp-and-lcd/39/comment-page-1/#comment-970</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdguru.com/?p=39#comment-970</guid>
		<description>Hdguru,
Do you have any knowledge on the new company Vizio? If so, i would appreciate your opinion. Thanks, Mack

&lt;strong&gt;I have only tested on Vizio for deinterlacing (check archive). With plasma prices so low today I recommend sticking to the top Japanese plasma makers (Pioneer, Panasonic or Hitachi) for known image quality and reliablity. If you shop carefully you will see the starting prices of these tier one brands are now within a few percent of the tier three ones (like Vizio, Maxent etc.)&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;HD GuruÃ‚Â &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hdguru,<br />
Do you have any knowledge on the new company Vizio? If so, i would appreciate your opinion. Thanks, Mack</p>
<p><strong>I have only tested on Vizio for deinterlacing (check archive). With plasma prices so low today I recommend sticking to the top Japanese plasma makers (Pioneer, Panasonic or Hitachi) for known image quality and reliablity. If you shop carefully you will see the starting prices of these tier one brands are now within a few percent of the tier three ones (like Vizio, Maxent etc.)</strong></p>
<p><strong>HD GuruÃ‚Â </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

